When Life Is Strange debuted in 2015 from developer Dontnod Entertainment, it lit a fire in my belly. I’d recently come out, and there was something infectiously joyful about getting the option to see young queer girls as heroes in a sci-fi, time-bending adventure. It also came at a time of great upheaval for LGBTQ+ rights, with the Supreme Court legalizing same-sex marriage nationwide. I point all of this out because it’s important not to get it twisted: the relationship between the quiet and introverted photographer Max Caulfield and the misfit Chloe Price, romantic or not, remains meaningful to me — and to many other queer fans — even after a decade.
So it pains me to say that Life Is Strange: Reunion is the most cowardly conclusion to that relationship for anyone who actually saw its value and complexity. Worse, it comes from one born from a truly staggering overcorrection of things about both the original 2015 game and Deck Nine’s 2024 sequel, Life Is Strange: Double Exposure.
A decade ago, Life Is Strange gave players a choice. As young teen Max Caulfield, players had to decide whether to sacrifice the small Oregon town of Arcadia Bay or to sacrifice Chloe. It’s revealed that after Max saved her the first time (and discovered she had the power to rewind time in the process), Chloe’s existence inadvertently forced fate to conjure up a storm to fix Max’s meddling with time. No matter which you chose, the ending perfectly paid off a phrase that’s repeatedly brought up throughout the original game: your actions will have consequences.
Even Double Exposure, as maligned as it is for reasons ranging from fans feeling Deck Nine “disrespected” the relationship between Max and Chloe to that weird, mind-boggling merge of universes in the last couple of episodes, attempted to grapple with the choices of the original game. If you sacrificed Chloe, Max’s guilt and loss of her best friend and romantic partner continued to haunt her. If you sacrificed the town, it’s revealed that her relationship with Chloe was bogged down by so much guilt that it was starting to build resentment between the two of them. Sue me, but I think the break-up makes sense — especially as it was so obvious that the love between the two of them was still there — and adds an interesting aspect to Max, Chloe, and their relationship. More importantly, we got to see a more mature Max deal with grief and form relationships with characters like Moses and Safi, as well as several other faculty members at Caledon University. Max without Chloe was always going to be unpopular, but Max’s development throughout Double Exposure felt meaningful.





