Schools use caning if other measures inadequate: Desmond Lee

Schools use caning if other measures inadequate: Desmond Lee


SINGAPORE – Caning as a disciplinary measure is used only “if all other measures are inadequate”, and schools follow strict protocols to ensure the safety of students, said Education Minister Desmond Lee in Parliament on May 5.

Caning must be approved by the principal and carried out only by authorised teachers, he said in response to several MPs, including Mr Alex Yeo (Potong Pasir), Dr Charlene Chen (Tampines GRC) and Mr Louis Chua (Sengkang GRC), who raised questions about the use of caning to address bullying.

Schools will also consider factors such as the student’s maturity and whether caning would help him learn from his mistake, said Mr Lee.

The minister noted that studies have linked frequent, unregulated corporal punishment in home settings to negative outcomes, but the school context is fundamentally different. He added that caning as a punishment is not new, and is part of a framework of disciplinary measures that provides “certainty of consequences”.

“If it is used, it is never administered in isolation but always as part of a suite of restorative and disciplinary measures,” he said.

“Schools will monitor the student’s well-being and progress after caning and counsel the student to reflect and learn while supporting the student’s rehabilitation,” Mr Lee said.

“This approach is based on research which shows that children and youth learn to make better choices when there are clear boundaries enforced by firm, meaningful consequences,” he said, adding that this has a “positive impact” on reducing bullying and helps the school community feel safe, learning in an orderly environment.

Overall, MPs on both sides of the House filed a total of 43 written and oral questions on bullying, following new anti-bullying measures released by the Ministry of Education (MOE) on April 15.

To allow MPs’ questions on bullying to be answered, Deputy Leader of the House Zaqy Mohamad requested more time for questions. The time was extended by about 15 minutes, and Mr Lee spent a total of 50 minutes addressing queries on the topic.

Apart from questioning the effectiveness of caning in reducing repeat offences and its long-term impact on mental health, MPs also sought transparency on how measures will be standardised across schools and the research underpinning them.

They also raised concerns about safeguards for students with special needs, and how punitive measures reconcile with MOE’s goal of a restorative school culture.

The ministry’s anti-bullying recommendations, which followed a year-long review involving 2,000 stakeholders, include standardised disciplinary guidelines across all schools. These include detention or suspension, caning and adjusting students’ conduct grades, as well as a new reporting channel, faster communication with parents, and funding to hire additional manpower for schools that need it.

To ensure consistency, Mr Lee told the House that all schools must develop their own anti-bullying policies by the end of 2026 based on the new MOE guidelines.

Addressing questions from Mr Patrick Tay (Pioneer), Mr Yeo and Mr Darryl David (Ang Mo Kio GRC) about why caning is meted out only for boys, Mr Lee said the practice aligns with the established legal framework under the Education (Schools) Regulations.

Citing the Criminal Procedure Code, which states that women should not be punished with caning, Mr Lee said: “Nonetheless, this does not mean that girls who bully or engage in hurtful behaviour are less culpable.”

He noted that while girls are not caned, they face a tiered disciplinary approach – including detention, suspension and adjustments to their conduct grades – to ensure that consequences remain proportionate to the severity of the offence.



Read Full Article At Source