Minister Bahlil Threatens to Cut Out Transit Countries Amid Singapore Tensions

Minister Bahlil Threatens to Cut Out Transit Countries Amid Singapore Tensions


Jakarta. Indonesia should stop routing its natural resource exports through third countries before they reach their final destinations, Energy and Mineral Resources Minister Bahlil Lahadalia has said, accusing intermediary countries of benefiting from Indonesian commodities without contributing to their production.

Bahlil said Indonesia should ship its natural resources directly to buyers, rather than allowing other countries to act as intermediaries and potentially claim the commodities as their own exports.

“Our natural resources must no longer be routed through other countries. If we are sending goods to China, they should go directly from Jakarta to China, not stop over in that ‘particular’ country,” Bahlil said at the Minerba Convex 2026 forum.

Bahlil’s comments have not explicitly named Singapore, and it remains unclear whether his proposed restrictions on transit-country exports are directly connected to the recent diplomatic friction between Indonesia and Singapore on transboundary haze and energy security.

“They just put a stamp on the goods and then claim that they are exports from their country. Where did you get those goods?” he said.

ADVERTISEMENT

Bahlil said the practice had been going on for years and instructed his director generals to ensure Indonesian commodities were no longer routed through intermediary countries unnecessarily.

“Ship them directly. Our goods have been handled this way for a long time. I cannot let them continue processing and handling our commodities like this. I have already instructed my director generals,” he said.

In international trade, transit countries can serve as logistics and trading hubs, where commodities are stored, processed, consolidated, or re-exported before reaching their final destinations. However, routing goods through such countries can complicate the identification of their original country of origin and the recording of export values.

He argued that intermediary countries benefited from the arrangements through tax revenue and improvements to their trade balances, while Indonesia lost out on the economic benefits of its own exports.




Read Full Article At Source

Share. Save. Don't Miss The Buzz: XFacebookRedditLINETelegramWhatsAppGmail

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *