For many users, botulinum toxin type A, or BoNT-A, is attractive because it offers a temporary way to reduce the appearance of facial lines caused by smiling, squinting or frowning, without the need for surgery. But as treatments become more regular and start earlier in life, some patients begin to notice results do not last as long as they used to, or that the effect seems weaker than before.
A recent Asia-Pacific-wide consumer study commissioned by global medical aesthetics company Merz Aesthetics surveyed 2,588 BoNT-A users in nine countries and territories, including Australia, Hong Kong, South Korea and Singapore. Conducted by research firm Frost & Sullivan, the study suggested that up to 81 per cent of respondents aged 21 to 55 had noticed a decline in the efficacy of their treatments over time – higher than levels reported in similar regional surveys from 2018 and 2021.
When this happens, patients often assume the dose is too low, the product is no longer working, or a fast metabolism is to blame. In some cases, however, the issue may be secondary non-response: a form of resistance whereby the body develops neutralising antibodies that reduce the treatment’s effect over time.
“Patients who notice diminished treatment results rarely describe it as resistance,” says Dr Vasanop Vachiramon, a dermatologist at Thailand’s Ramathibodi Hospital and corresponding author of the study “Identifying Different Immunoresistance Risk Profiles”. “They report shorter duration, inconsistent results or changes they can’t quite explain.”
When patients notice fading results, they may respond by shortening the interval between injections, increasing the dose or switching brands repeatedly, without recognising that the underlying issue may be BoNT-A resistance.

Treatment formulations matter
Read Full Article At Source

