Christopher Nolan’s Long and Winding Road to The Odyssey

Christopher Nolan’s Long and Winding Road to The Odyssey


Spoilers for The Odyssey follow.

The end is the beginning in The Odyssey, Christopher Nolan’s powerful, claustrophobic take on Homer’s epic, which harkens back to ideas woven throughout his career. It opens with the kind of voiceover-laden montage we’ve come to expect from his conclusions — dating back to The Dark Knight in 2008, and continuing through Interstellar, Dunkirk, Tenet, and Oppenheimer — where images skip through time, and themes about half-truths, self-deceptions, and the world at large are stated plainly against musical crescendos. Here, it takes the form of Travis Scott’s nameless bard banging his staff against a tabletop while recounting the tale we’re about to see, as spliced scenes of a lonely Odysseus (Matt Damon) and his deception via the Trojan Horse come to the fore.

The Odyssey’s 172-minute runtime feels cut from this cloth as a cinematic epic made largely of impressions and clashing points of view en route to its own nestled climax. It’s both unlike anything Nolan has ever made, and yet the exact film he seemed destined to direct after decades of telling stories in its vein. Homer’s Odyssey is nearly 3,000 years old, and has had considerable influence on western canon, so it’s no surprise to look back and notice how many of Nolan’s stories are about men making their way home. However, this adaptation is just as much about Nolan imposing his artistic viewpoint on the text; whether or not it’s the best Nolan movie ever made, it’s arguably the most Nolan movie imaginable.

Who Killed the World?

Nolan isn’t a political filmmaker in the bipartisan sense, but his biggest, most visible works are injected with political anxieties. Where The Dark Knight wrestled with the modern U.S. surveillance state, its sloppier sequel, The Dark Knight Rises, housed some ultimately self-defeating economic themes within its grandiose opera. However, his space-faring follow-up, Interstellar, marked a considerable shift in how he expressed his worldview with more abstract and egalitarian concerns about the general state of things (rather than, well, the state).

The tale of one man’s journey home to his daughter, Interstellar’s backdrop is a world ravaged by scarcity and climate catastrophe. The same throughline can be found in Tenet, as both films feature a tension between present and future generations over what becomes of Mother Earth. Nolan isn’t quite the flower child that James Cameron would become with The Abyss and his Avatar trilogy — his form is ultimately one of rickety masculine restraint, as is his dramatic focus — but of late, his subdued sentimentality has been leaking out with more pressure and urgency.

Just as Interstellar and Tenet are twin sci-fi vehicles steeped in fears of being judged by the future, Dunkirk and Oppenheimer are more concrete historical versions of those concerns, as World War II movies struggling with the perception of heroic figures and events. On the one hand, you have Churchill’s famous “We Shall Fight on the Beaches” speech — rousing words which Nolan contrasts with death, lost innocence, and looming uncertainty. On the other hand, you have the original sin of the modern world: the atomic bomb, whose maker becomes a haunting canvas for questions of what it means to live with the weight of one’s own actions.

This is the same world, cinematically speaking, into which The Odyssey is birthed. The bomb this time, however, is the hull of a wooden horse, shot with the same curiosity and gradual caution as the Trinity device in Nolan’s biopic. The nuclear chain reaction is the ethical fracture caused by corrupting “Zeus’ law” — smuggling war within a peace offering. It’s a broken contract that forces Odysseus to consider what his actions have wrought for the rest of the world and for generations to come.




Read Full Article At Source

Share. Save. Don't Miss The Buzz: XFacebookRedditLINETelegramWhatsAppGmail