Supergirl and the Debate at the Heart of the New Movie

When we re-meet Supergirl at the top of the movie, she’s partying under a red sun in order to dampen enough of her powers to stay absolutely wasted all the time, and struggling with finding a place she can call home. She doesn’t want to wear the “S” suit like her cousin Kal-El (David Corenswet), and she knows she can’t earnestly believe in people the way he does, because she wasn’t raised by good people in Kansas who are still alive. When she arrives on Earth, it’s too noisy, too strange, and doesn’t feel like home. Her journey isn’t about loving all this, but about accepting her destiny as someone who can inspire others to be better, even as she still has work to do on herself. She’s not perfect, but she can be kind, and she may not be nice, but she can be good.

At least until she stabs Krem… twice.

After throwing Krem far away from a fight and saving Ruthye from an attack by the villain’s Brigands, it’s clear that Ruthye has put her revenge aside and taken Supergirl’s words to heart. Meanwhile, Supergirl flies off to confront Krem, where he does a classic “you’ll never stop me, I’ll keep coming no matter what” speech. So Kara looks at him, stabs him as she says, “This is for my dog,” and then stabs him again straight through the throat, killing him, as she says, “And this is for the little girl whose life you ruined.” Not insignificantly, while this happens, Lobo (Jason Momoa) — who has been encouraging Ruthye to kill Krem in direct opposition to Supergirl’s influence — hungrily says “Yes!” in the distance as he watches on his space-bike. Basically, Lobo’s philosophy that “revenge=good” has won out in the end, not Supergirl’s philosophy that revenge doesn’t take the pain away.

Perhaps even more mind-boggling is the second line here, because so much of the movie is pushing back on the view of both Supergirl and Ruthye as “mere” little girls, as well as how they are not ruined: Their respective trauma is part of who they are and always will be. It’s not about being ruined; it’s about learning to live with the hurt and how it impacts your decisions that makes you who you are.

This ending is also diametrically opposed to how it plays out in the source material for this film, the comic book Supergirl: Woman of Tomorrow by Tom King and Bilquis Evely. The graphic novel is told at least in part through narration by Ruthye, which we discover towards the end of the eight-issue series is a book written by Ruthye which she calls “fictitious fiddle-faddle” when Supergirl visits her about three centuries after the main events of the comic. This future-set scene takes place directly after Supergirl, whittled to a nub by their adventure tracking down Krem, explains to Ruthye that she was trying to teach her how to make the right choices over their adventures, but it didn’t work, so now she has to kill Krem. Ruthye shouts that she was listening, she did hear, and she did learn; they instead put Krem in the Phantom Zone, where he indeed learned his lesson over 300 years of imprisonment. Released at last, Krem begs for the older Ruthye’s forgiveness. Then she conks him on the head, seemingly killing him.

That in itself is a heavily debated moment of the book, but contrast Supergirl backing off killing in favor of reform at the end of that comic, and Ruthye (at least initially) choosing redemption over revenge. Funnily enough, we’re also told via that “fictitious fiddle-faddle” narration that Ruthye had Supergirl stab Krem to death with her sword, which we, the reader, know didn’t happen. So perhaps one could look at the movie as an adaptation of the book Ruthye wrote later, except that in the movie, there’s no narration, no future-set scene — just Supergirl impaling Krem and watching him bleed out in the dirt.

Supergirl Images