SINGAPORE – Singapore has to retain its ability to say “no” to others, even if it has to pay a price for staking out its position on issues, said Foreign Minister Vivian Balakrishnan.
Speaking in Parliament on Feb 27, he noted that the Republic will face more strategic dilemmas and difficult choices in a tumultuous world. On some issues, Singapore’s interests will not always be aligned with the great or middle powers, or its immediate neighbours.
But as pressure to take sides mounts externally and domestically, the country has to stand firm and say no, Dr Balakrishnan said in a speech that laid out Singapore’s foreign policy stance during the debate on his ministry’s budget.
“Sometimes, we will pay a price for staking out our position,” he said. “But… if we ever lose that ability to say no, then that is the day that Singapore loses its relevance – indeed, our independence.”
It is not about choosing sides, but upholding principles and Singapore’s long-term national interests, he added.
He told the House that a new stable equilibrium will not emerge in 2026, with the world now more dangerous for small countries.
While the global order that used to underpin Singapore’s success has ended, the country has the agency, resilience and resources to chart its own course, he said, describing the current situation as “not just a small tremor, (but a) geostrategic tectonic plate rupture”.
Singapore will exercise its agency to articulate its positions – which have not been universally welcomed in the past – that align with its national interests, he said.
Dr Balakrishnan acknowledged that Singaporeans will have different views on foreign policy issues, though they do not necessarily have to agree on their stances.
“But we must agree that these are matters to be discussed and decided by Singaporeans alone,” he said.
“With increased global contestation, foreign actors will want us to see and accept their views. They will try to seed their narratives. There may be attempts to create fake news or deepen internal division.”
Singapore must be aware that geopolitical contestation has become a tussle for hearts and minds, and exercise caution as the diverse population here is vulnerable to becoming polarised and fractured, he added.
In his speech, Dr Balakrishnan cited past examples where Singapore consistently called out violations of international law – when
Russia invaded Ukraine,
US’ actions in Venezuela
.





