Proposed law seeks jail or reformative training for young scam offenders after High Court ruling

Proposed law seeks jail or reformative training for young scam offenders after High Court ruling


SINGAPORE – Young scam mules could soon face jail or reformative training (RT) as the default punishment rather than probation, under a proposed law to reinforce the Government’s deterrent stance against such offences.

On Nov 3, the Sentencing (Scams) Bill was introduced in Parliament following a recent High Court ruling that favoured rehabilitative options for young scam offenders.

The High Court in September allowed the appeals of four young scam offenders who had been given RT, and instead ordered them to be placed on probation ranging from a year to 18 months. These four committed their offences while under the age of 21.

Probation allows offenders to serve their sentences in the community under conditions like curfews and supervision without incurring a criminal record.

Those sentenced to RT are detained in a centre to undergo strict regimens, including foot drills and counselling. An RT sentence leaves a criminal record.

The High Court also dismissed an appeal by the prosecution against a 17-year-old mule who was sentenced to a short detention order and community service instead of RT.

The High Court judgment, issued by a three-judge panel comprising Chief Justice Sundaresh Menon, Justice Ang Cheng Hock and Justice Hoo Sheau Peng, ruled that RT or jail time should not be the default sentence for young scam mules.

On Nov 3, the Sentencing (Scams) Bill was introduced as the court’s decision was inconsistent with Parliament’s deterrent stance against scam offences.

The Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) said the Bill will reiterate Parliament’s intention that people aged 21 and below who commit scam offences should face RT or jail time, rather than probation or other rehabilitative options, as the primary or default options unless there are exceptional circumstances.

MHA said: “If a deterrent approach is not taken, Singapore’s scam and youth offending situation could deteriorate.”

The appeals of two other offenders, who were treated as adults, were dismissed.

One was between 20 and 22 years old when he surrendered his bank account and committed cheating. His sentence of 14 weeks’ jail was upheld.

The other was 27 years old when she committed three scam-related offences. Her sentence of seven months and two weeks’ jail and a $500 fine was upheld.




Read Full Article At Source

Share. Save. Don't Miss The Buzz: XFacebookRedditLINETelegramWhatsAppGmail

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *