Explore the PSLE Companion microsite for more insights and tips.
SINGAPORE – Choosing the right secondary school after the PSLE should not be based solely on a school’s cut-off points or the child’s score, said five secondary school principals on Oct 31.
Instead, parents should make practical considerations like the time it takes to get to the school and whether its unique programmes and co-curricular activities cater to the child’s interests.
Speaking at The Straits Times Post-PSLE Forum on Oct 31, Goh Soon Hoe, principal of Ahmad Ibrahim Secondary School, said: “If the PSLE result was attained through sheer force of tuition, then maybe that AL (aggregate level) score may not be a good representation of what a day-to-day life in secondary school education is all about.”
Goh was one of five principals on a panel who agreed that a child’s PSLE score is not always indicative of their true academic potential.
Hosted by ONE FM 91.3 radio presenter Lavinia Tan, the event was attended by about 120 people at the SPH Media News Centre auditorium and 70 who joined online. Now into its fourth year, this series is intended to inform parents whose children sat the PSLE in September and are awaiting results in end-November before applying to secondary schools.
Lucy Toh, principal of National Junior College (NJC), which offers the Integrated Programme (IP) – a six-year secondary school pathway – said relying on tuition for good grades is not sustainable in secondary school, where students take more subjects.
She added that parents gunning for IP schools like NJC also need to consider if their children have the high level of maturity and self-directedness required for this pathway, which allows students to skip national examinations at Sec 4.
“If your child is not yet operating at that level of maturity in Sec 1, then IP could be a bit of a sharp shock to the system,” she said.
Read Full Article At Source
