Expedition 33 Devs It Would Be Overlooked if Called a Turn-Based RPG

But why? Clair Obscur: Expedition 33 went on to receive praise from fans and critics (including a 9/10 review from IGN), while ending its already explosive year with big wins across The Game Awards, BAFTA, DICE, and IGN award shows. Its positive reception was so intense that even the developers at Sandfall Interactive weren’t prepared for its towering Metacritic score.

Yoshida acknowledged Clair Obscur: Expedition 33 as a quality release long before it reached the hands of the public. He was impressed early on, calling attention to its “combination of turn-based JRPG mechanics and real-time action inputs reminiscent of The Legend of Dragoon.” The problem, however, was that, at the time, he was concerned its success could be affected by what he observed to be a tendency for turn-based JRPGs to be seen as outdated.

Game-award-winning formula or not, Yoshida feared Clair Obscur: Expedition 33 would be ignored by some gamers if they saw that “turn-based” label. As a result, Kepler got creative and instead started selling Sandfall’s first game as an experience with “reactive turn-based battles” instead, and the rest is history.

Clair Obscur: Expedition 33 Review – Screenshots