SINGAPORE – The drowning death of popular Indian singer Zubeen Garg highlights the responsibilities of vessel operators when dealing with intoxicated passengers, lawyers said.
Mr Nico Lee, managing director of Triangle Legal, said that under the Maritime and Port Authority of Singapore (Port) Regulations, the owner, agent, or master of the vessel must not permit an intoxicated person who is under the influence of alcohol or drugs to board a vessel, if it is to such extent as to endanger the safety of the vessel or the crew or any other person.
He said: “In terms of civil liability, it could be argued that a yacht captain is negligent as he owes a prima facie duty of care to guests on board under general negligence principles.”
The issue came to light after the 52-year-old artiste from the north-eastern state of Assam drowned while swimming in the sea near Lazarus Island.
Mr Garg and his entourage of about 15 individuals were partying on Sept 19, 2025, on a chartered vessel, which they boarded at Marina at Keppel Bay.
A death certificate issued by the Singapore General Hospital listed his cause of death as drowning.
An autopsy report showed that Mr Garg had 333mg of alcohol per 100ml of blood in his system, which would have impacted his coordination.
In comparison, the current drink driving limit is 80mg of alcohol per 100ml of blood.
During a coroner’s inquiry in January, the captain of the yacht testified that he saw the singer and several others drinking alcohol before boarding the yacht.
The group also brought alcohol on board and continued to drink during the trip.
He said the singer was so unsteady, his friends had to hold on to his arms as he boarded the vessel.
While on the vessel, he walked unsteadily and needed help moving around.
Citing Mr Garg’s case, Triangle Legal’s Mr Lee said the circumstances were serious, as the controller of the vessel knew that the guest was intoxicated.
He added that the singer may not have understood or processed a safety briefing for all passengers.
“That combination makes reliance on an ordinary briefing inadequate. If intoxication reaches a level that endangers the safety of the vessel or persons on board, the person in charge should not permit boarding at all,” said Mr Lee, adding that some safety measures could have been included, such as stopping the intoxicated guest from entering the water.
The vessel’s operators could also have assigned a crew member to directly supervise him, or ensured that he received a one-to-one explanation when he was capable of understanding.



