A former national serviceman has publicly challenged Defence Minister Chan Chun Sing’s remarks in Parliament that national servicemen should not conflate their service with a financial transaction, questioning whether the current allowance structure amounts to exploitation and describing the treatment of those who serve as “a betrayal.”
Jonathan Tee, who states in a video that he is guards-trained and recce-trained and has completed his full reservist duty cycle, made the remarks in a social media post published on Sunday, 1 March 2026 — two days after Chan’s statement in Parliament on 27 February 2026.
According to his company website, Tee underwent RSAF pilot training in 1997.
Tee’s post accompanied a video he said he had recorded some years earlier, originally made in response to remarks by then-Defence Minister Ng Eng Hen on the NS liabilities of new male citizens.
Chan’s remarks draw public scrutiny
During the Committee of Supply debate on 27 February 2026, Chan rejected a proposal by Workers’ Party Member of Parliament Kenneth Tiong to align second-year National Service Full-time (NSF) allowances with Singapore’s Local Qualifying Salary (LQS) of S$1,800 per month.
Tiong questioned whether duty and compensation were mutually exclusive as he noted that SAF regulars serve the same mission while receiving market-rate salaries and CPF contributions.
“I don’t think duty and compensation are incompatible at all,” he said.
Tiong also disagreed that accommodation, food and equipment should be considered part of a compensation package.
“These are simply operational necessities for the SAF,” he said, arguing that feeding, housing and equipping soldiers are required to ensure operational readiness.
He reiterated that the proposal would cost less than 1 per cent of the defence budget and asked why the funds could not be found “to pay our soldiers fairly”.
In response, Chan said he would be “the first one to champion” recognition for NSFs and NSmen, but drew a firm distinction between recognition and monetary compensation.
“Those of us who have served in national service will be very careful to not use the word compensate,” Chan said, adding that “no amount of monetary compensation can be equated with the contributions of our NS men.”
He urged members of the House not to reduce what he called “this sacred duty” into a transactional relationship.
Tee: “Is it exploitation?”
In his 1 March post, Tee said he agreed in principle that NS should not be viewed as purely transactional but added that he was “a little offended” by the framing.
“We all know that NSFs are cheap labour for NDP and other services when required and the joke is that even McDonald’s pay us better,” he wrote.
Tee cited current NSF allowance rates, noting that recruits and privates receive S$790 per month, sergeants receive S$1,130 and lieutenants receive S$1,530 — all without Central Provident Fund (CPF) contributions.






