Ang Mo Kio corridor murder: Woman gets life sentence for killing boyfriend

Nguyen was assessed to have alcohol-use disorder and likely to be in a state of “acute alcohol intoxication” at the time, a report by the Institute of Mental Health showed.

She was represented by three sets of lawyers under the Legal Assistance Scheme for Capital Offences scheme, namely, Mr Favian Kang from Centurion Law, Mr Kalaithasan Karuppaya from Regent Law and Mr Ng Yuan Siang from Eugene Thuraisingam’s eponymous law firm.

At the trial, Nguyen – a petite woman with long hair – testified about her tumultuous relationship with the victim.

She had first come to Singapore in 2010 and met her husband while working in a KTV lounge. They married after two months and have two children together.

She said she last visited her children in 2019 and her last contact with her husband was some time before that.

She said Mr Cho was also married when they began their relationship, and that he grew fond of her after she cared for his daughter, who was more than two years old at the time.

However, she said they drank and quarrelled every day and fought about five times a week.

In the defence’s closing submissions, it urged the court to find her guilty of a lesser charge of culpable homicide not amounting to murder instead.

It argued that this was “not an egregious case”, but that of a couple in an unhealthy relationship, which was “plagued by quarrels and fights”.

“Ms Nguyen and the deceased allowed their passions to get the better of themselves due to alcohol,” the lawyers said. 

“A misunderstanding was blown out of proportion. They quarrelled and hit each other many times before, but their previous fights did not reach a nasty stage like the present instance, where both sustained multiple serious stab injuries.”

The defence also said that Nguyen was so intoxicated that she could not have formed the intention to cause the stab wounds to the victim, or that his death was caused by a sudden fight.

The lawyers argued that Nguyen suffered very serious and life-threatening injuries, raising the possibility that the victim had inflicted them during a violent struggle, which is a foothold to establishing the defence of a sudden fight.

However, the judge rejected the defences put forth by the lawyers and convicted Nguyen.

The prosecution said that it would not be seeking the death penalty for this case and that there was “no issue of caning” given her gender. Under the law, women cannot be caned.

The defence had nothing to add, since the only other possible sentence for the charge was life imprisonment.

Nguyen told the court: “I wish to appeal.”

She was convicted of murder under Section 300(c) of the Penal Code, where the act is done with the intention to cause bodily injury to a person and the injury intended is enough to cause death. The maximum penalty is death or life imprisonment with caning.