Syndicate linked to S$51 million in scam losses sold chat accounts to criminals; financier jailed

Low was roped into the criminal enterprise by his friend, 47-year-old Tan Shay Howe, who had come to learn of the illegal business in December 2022.

Tan introduced Low to Kok in October 2023, as Kok was looking for investors.

Kok told Low that the business was profitable, guaranteeing that he would receive S$15,000 to S$20,000 per month.

He asked for S$100,000, but Low invested only S$40,000. At the same time, Tan invested S$25,000 for a cut in the profits.

On May 29, 2024, the Anti-Scam Command raided the syndicate’s office and seized 24,000 SIM cards, 27 SMS modems and other electronic items.

Investigations revealed that the syndicate generated S$887,477 in profits between November 2023 and May 2024.

Between January 2024 and May 2024, the seized SIM cards were linked to a total of 2,393 police reports made by 2,393 victims in a variety of scams.

Of the total losses of S$51 million, the largest figure was from investment scams, which led to S$24 million in losses, followed closely by job scams.

The court heard that Low had been told by other members that the business was illegal, and that their customers were likely using the accounts for scams.

He knew how the syndicate ran and that it facilitated scams through the provision of one-time passwords to its customers.

He also knew that the business was paid for in cryptocurrency, which cannot be traced to people or sources.

Low made about S$92,651 from the group’s illegal activities, spending at least S$6,000 on personal expenses such as food and drinks.

SENTENCING ARGUMENTS

Deputy Public Prosecutor Jordon Li sought a jail term of at least 52 months and two weeks, and a fine of S$52,000.

He said at least S$1.1 billion had been lost by scam victims in 2024, and that criminal syndicates are increasingly using local SIM cards to perpetrate scams.

Low was a financier of an elaborate and highly successful illegal business profiting from the sale of chat accounts using SIM cards registered in the names of other people, said Mr Li.

He said Low knowingly and willingly participated as a member of the syndicate for around seven months and received “the lion’s share” of the profits despite not doing much.

This shows the role Low occupied and the level he was at within the group – at the top of the hierarchy, said Mr Li.

Defence lawyers Adrian Wee and Lynette Chang of Lighthouse Law sought 39 months’ jail and a fine of S$52,000.

Mr Wee said the approach had to be principled and that the prosecution could not say one offender was a key player because of what he did, then say that another offender was a key player because he did not do much but received profits.

“If not, everyone is a key player,” said Mr Wee. “If everyone is special, no one is.”

He said his client’s role never extended beyond that of a “passive financier” while Tan went from financier to owner, operator and landlord of the business.

During most of the time, Low was in Dubai and had no involvement in business operations, said Mr Wee.

The judge said that while Low was not involved in the operations of the syndicate, he noted that Low had financed the illegal enterprise.

It was through this that the group managed to scale up its operations, he said.

Tan had been jailed for three-and-a-half years and two weeks and fined S$11,000 in August 2025.

After the prosecution appealed, his jail term was increased to four years, four months and two weeks in April this year.

For being part of a locally linked organised criminal group, Low could have been jailed for up to five years, fined up to S$100,000, or both.

For engaging in a criminal conspiracy to acquire benefits of criminal conduct, Low could have been jailed for up to 10 years and fined up to S$500,000.