You don’t typically put Sherlock Holmes, P.G. Wodehouse, and Wallace and Gromit in the same thought — unless you’re Pascal Cammisotto, writer and director for Draw Me A Pixel’s upcoming time-travel adventure Crushed in Time. Cammisotto tells Polygon he used these as starting points for building on his previous work, There Is No Game: Wrong Dimension. Crushed in Time is a meta story about existing inside a game to tell a story about making a game — and all the mess and stress that entails. It sounds absurd written out like that, but after playing a 45-minute demo of the game, I can’t wait to see more.
The game inside the game is not in a happy state. The story starts moments after the fictional game’s launch, as negative reviews flood in and send the fictional team into a panic. Your job is figuring out how to fix it — deducing what’s wrong, if you will. And who better to deduce something than Arthur Conan Doyle’s famous detective, Sherlock Holmes? In Crushed In Time, the answer is “probably anyone.” This version of Holmes is a bit dingy, and Watson isn’t much better. They bumble around and flummox themselves over the most trivial of daily rituals, like fetching the mail or opening a door. Hence the Wallace and Gromit comparisons, which Cammisotto says are very much intentional. The ridiculous is perfectly normal and reasonable here, and I couldn’t help thinking how at home this version of Holmes would be in one of Wodehouse’s Blandings Castle or Jeeves stories. Yet, as is the case with Wodehouse’s writing, it’s all exquisitely well-balanced. So far, anyway, Crushed in Time has excellent comedic timing and a lightness of touch to the writing, which means jokes never cross into being obnoxious.
Holmes and Watson’s problems are the fictional game’s problems, so your task is helping them fix them. But, as a visitor to the game world, you have to operate on the game’s logic, which means you have no inventory and no means of interacting with things other than poking and pulling at them. It’s a clever little tongue-in-cheek nod to the creative process and a hugely enjoyable bit of physics-based puzzling. Anything is pokeable and pullable. In the first puzzle, you have to wake Holmes from a nap. The phone is the answer, but the cord is trapped in a knobless drawer. So you borrow the door’s handle, angle a lob across the room, and fit it onto the drawer. Then you slap the phone to make it ring, put the knob back — and realize the door is locked. Holmes is blocking the cubby where the key lives. The solution? Tug on his newspaper to annoy him so he moves his head and gives you space to tinker with the cubby to get the key.
It’s deliciously tactile and, once you catch on to how the world’s physics actually work, highly intuitive. The demo’s brevity left me wanting more, so to fill the time between now and Draw Me A Pixel’s promised second demo, I spoke with Cammisotto over email about the process of making such an unusual puzzle adventure.
There’ve been dozens of versions of Holmes and Watson over the decades. What did you want to bring to your versions of these characters?
Our version of Sherlock Holmes and Dr. Watson is very different from what we are used to seeing in general. Here, we are dealing with a comedic and parodic version of the famous detective. You could even say that his deductions are among the worst imaginable. And Dr. Watson is hardly any better.
I wanted to create a duo that is both funny and endearing, a bit like Wallace and Gromit in terms of tone and lightness.
They are characters I love putting into inexplicable situations through the very meta aspect of our two games, and writing their reactions is a real treat. The voice actors also had a lot of fun with these two oddballs.
The method of interacting with the environment is so tactile and enjoyable — and also pretty unusual for adventure games. How did it come to be? Did it just spring to life fully formed, or did you go through some trial-and-error before settling on pulling things in the environment?
When the idea of creating an adventure centered around these two characters first emerged, our thinking about the gameplay came down to one question: How would Nintendo’s teams approach the creation of a point-and-click game if their goal was to reach a broader audience?
Point-and-click is a niche market. To many players, it can often feel a bit austere and old-school. We wanted to break away from that rather unsexy framework and find a new, playful, and appealing angle.
The elasticity mechanic came to the table fairly quickly. It is very visual, it also plays with sound, and the interaction itself is very simple. That said, we iterated on the concept for a good year because, as it turns out, it was a real technical challenge.
Read Full Article At Source
