Why only boys? Parents divided over caning rules in S’pore schools

Why only boys? Parents divided over caning rules in S’pore schools


Some parents have questioned why caning in Singapore schools applies only to boys, after the Ministry of Education (MOE) announced plans to standardise disciplinary measures across schools.

A former teacher, Ms Tan, was among those who raised concerns after learning that the punishment cannot be administered to female students.

“Why should there be a disparity?” she asked.

MOE said on April 15 that all schools in Singapore will be required to adopt standardised disciplinary measures to combat bullying by 2027. These include caning and suspension, with caning reserved for male students in upper primary levels and above.

Schools currently have some leeway in handling such cases, but the new mandate aims to ensure greater consistency across the board.

Online reactions to the announcement showed strong support for caning as part of disciplinary measures for offences such as bullying, cheating, gambling, vaping, fighting and drug abuse.

However, some also questioned why caning is restricted to boys. In an April 15 Reddit thread that has more than 130 comments, several users argued that girl-on-girl bullying is “often worse” than boy-on-boy bullying

“Only boys can do wrong,” one wrote sarcastically, while another said that excluding girls from caning sends the message that women are “weaker”.

Stomp has reached out to MOE for comment.

‘Discipline should be based on actions, not gender’

Ms Tan, who is in her 50s and a mother of two daughters, told Stomp she supports tougher measures to tackle bullying in schools, and believes caning should apply to both boys and girls.

She stressed that discipline should be based on a child’s actions, not their gender, adding that girls should not expect lighter punishment, which boys may see as unfair.

“Why do people think that boys can take caning and girls can’t?” she asked.

She also pointed to non-physical forms of bullying such as emotional and cyberbullying, saying their effects can be as severe, if not worse, than physical bullying, and that girls are equally capable of such behaviour.

Having used physical punishment on her daughters, Ms Tan said she stands by it as an effective way of addressing serious issues “permanently”.

However, she emphasised that caning should be a “necessary last resort” after other measures, such as counselling, have been exhausted.

Mr Toh, a retiree in his 60s, said he feels girls should also be caned for certain offences, particularly those involving violence.





Read Full Article At Source