Law passed allowing public sector data to be shared with ‘trusted external partners’

Under the third safeguard, all external partners will also be bound by clear terms of use that set out how the data is protected and used.

“Currently, public agencies already need to make sure external partners whom they share data with are able to meet these requirements, and are contractually bound to do so,” said Ms Lau.

“While public agencies already hold external partners to such requirements, we will provide more specific guidance to ensure consistency across different partnerships.”

To deter misconduct when it comes to shared data, individuals from external partners will also be liable for criminal offences.

Those convicted of an offence will be subject to a fine of not more than S$5,000 (US$3,900) or jail term of not more than two years or both, said MDDI. This is aligned with data-related offences that apply to public officers under the PSGA.

“Expanded data sharing will mean expanded accountability too,” added Ms Lau.

Authorities can also revoke authorisation and cease data sharing arrangements with partners where appropriate.

“With the proposed amendments, we maintain our commitment to protect data, while addressing the reality that effective service delivery requires trusted partnerships beyond public agencies,” said Ms Lau.

“These amendments will enable vulnerable Singaporeans to receive faster, targeted and more coordinated support, when they need it most.”

ACCOUNTABILITY AND TRANSPARENCY

During the Bill’s debate, eight Members of Parliament raised their concerns about various aspects of the safeguards, especially those related to ensuring accountability.

MP Kenneth Tiong (WP-Aljunied) said he supported the PSGA but wanted to “place some significant concerns” on the record. He brought up the TraceTogether incident in 2021, in which the government clarified that the police can access TraceTogether data under the Criminal Procedure Code.