Do you remember there was a time when a 27-inch monitor felt like the gold-standard size for PC gaming. That has changed rather quickly. Hardware makers are increasingly treating 32 inches as the preferred size for their premium gaming monitors, usually pairing it with a 4K OLED panel,<\/p>\n
And for me, the shift makes sense. 4K truly feels right at this size. Text remains sharp, game visuals have considerably more detail and there is enough screen space to make the monitor useful for work as well. The problem is that everyone seems to be making one. ASUS, Alienware, MSI, LG and Samsung already have their own versions, many of them using similar panels and offering the same combination of 4K, 240Hz or faster refresh rates. These specs are impressive, but they are no longer particularly helpful when practically every monitor on your shortlist says the same thing.<\/p>\n
Gigabyte has been in this space long enough to know that. While the company may still be more closely associated with motherboards and graphics cards, it has built a pretty wide collection of gaming monitors over the years. The M32U, launched back in 2022, was one of earliest 32-inch 4K gaming monitors around, while models such as the Aorus FO32U2P even adopted the QD-OLED panel. Its monitors have not always been consistent, especially where software is concerned, but Gigabyte is hardly an outsider trying to jump onto the OLED bandwagon.<\/p>\n
Which brings me to the Gigabyte MO32U24<\/b>. It is their latest 4K QD-OLED<\/b> gaming monitor housed in a 31.5-inch (or simply 32-inch) frame with a 240Hz refresh rate<\/b> and 0.03ms response time<\/b>. At a glance, it does not sound all that different from the many alternatives already available. The difference, at least according to Gigabyte, is its newer fourth-generation QD-OLED panel, along with an improved ObsidianShield<\/b> coating and a HyperNits<\/b> feature that can push HDR brightness higher without crushing shadows or blowing out highlights. Taken at face value, these are not the sort of upgrades that catches one\u2019s eyes, but after spending time with the monitor, I think Gigabyte is on to something.<\/p>\n The Gigabyte MO32U24 is a non-flashy, strong performing QD-OLD gmaing monitor<\/p>\n Photo: HWZ<\/p>\n<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n Out of the box, the MO32U24 did not look much like a gaming monitor \u2013 at least not in the \u201ctraditional\u201d sense. There is no elaborate RGB lighting or exaggerated back design; instead, it is mostly black, fairly plain and perhaps even a little too simple-looking. But that said, I do not think that is a bad thing. The monitor was easy to assemble, felt reassuringly stable and offered enough height, tilt and swivel adjustment for me to position it comfortably. The compact base also left plenty of room for those of you who like to personalise your desk with figurines and accessories.<\/p>\n Can you make a stand that doesn\u2019t takes up too much space and yet holds your monitor steady? Gigabyte says yes.<\/p>\n Photo: HWZ<\/p>\n<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n Samsung Display\u2019s QD-OLED panels have become something of a known quantity across gaming monitors, and their core performance tends to be quite consistent regardless of the brand wrapped around them. That is largely true of the MO32U24 as well: games show plenty of detail at 4K, colours have the richness I have come to expect from QD-OLED and text remains sharp enough for everyday work. I could comfortably keep several windows open beside one another, while the colour fringing around fine text that affected earlier generations was barely noticeable.<\/p>\n Gigabyte\u2019s ObsidianShield coating is also pretty useful. Not only does it reduce glare significantly and boosts black levels, but it also enhances the hardness of the screen\u2019s surface so that it can handle routine cleaning and everyday wear much better. And using the monitor in a darker room is when the QD-OLED panel really began to show what it could do. The neon-lit streets of Cyberpunk 2077 looked particularly impressive, with brightly coloured signs standing out against deep blacks. Ghost of Tsushima was impressive for a different reason, with its vivid fields, changing skies and fine environmental details looking splendid at 4K and with wide colour range.<\/p>\n Accessing the monitor menu is done using the joystick button<\/p>\n Photo: HWZ<\/p>\n<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n It was a similar experience with Netflix too. I played Stranger Things Season 5 and the darker scenes in the series retained plenty of shadow detail, while its brighter lighting effects had enough impact to stand out from the background. The Sandman also suited the panel particularly well, thanks to its mixture of dark, atmospheric scenes and more colourful fantasy settings. This was where I found Gigabyte\u2019s HyperNits feature to be quite interesting. It can increase brightness by up to 30% under in HDR Peak 1000 mode, and with it enabled, smaller highlights looked noticeably brighter without washing out the rest of the image. It cannot completely overcome OLED\u2019s brightness limitations, but I liked the effect enough to leave it switched on.<\/p>\n Gigabyte has included several gaming features, although their usefulness varies. Tactical Switch 2.0 can reduce the active picture to 27 or 24 inches, but it felt strange buying a 32-inch monitor only to deliberately use less of it. The refresh-rate counter and Black Equalizer were informative, while the Eagle Eye magnification window and green Night Vision mode were features I could happily ignore. The on-screen menus are at least responsive and easy to navigate with the joystick beneath the panel,<\/p>\n Connectivity includes two full-bandwidth HDMI 2.1 ports, DisplayPort 1.4, USB-C, two downstream USB-A ports and a headphone jack, together with a KVM function. However, USB-C supplies only 18W of power, which is nowhere near enough for most laptops, while DisplayPort 2.1 would have better future-proof the monitor.<\/p>\n The Gigabyte MO32U24 doesn\u2019t need a separate power brick to work too.<\/p>\n Photo: HWZ<\/p>\n<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n The thing about the Gigabyte MO32U24 is that it does not do anything particularly out of the ordinary. It is simply a 32-inch 4K QD-OLED gaming monitor with a 240Hz refresh rate, joining a segment already filled with monitors that can make almost exactly the same claim. There is no dual-mode 480Hz option, no DisplayPort 2.1 and no elaborate design feature that immediately sets it apart.<\/p>\n And yet, I kept coming back to how little there was to complain about during everyday use. The panel is fast, sharp and very good at HDR, and I like how the ObsidianShield coating better protects the display\u2019s surface. The compact stand and understated styling also mean the MO32U24 won\u2019t look out of place in a work environment. Those who want a higher USB-C power delivery will be disappointed though and could consider options from ROG or AOC instead (these brands have gaming monitors that support up to 90W).<\/p>\n The MO32U24 has a listed local price of $1,799<\/b>, although it could be found for $1,599<\/b> at most online stores including Techyard. At the lower price, I think it\u2019s easy to recommend this Gigabyte gaming monitor if <\/i>you\u2019re looking for a 32-inch OLED gaming monitor \u2013 otherwise you might want to consider this one.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n Do you remember there was a time when a 27-inch monitor felt like the gold-standard size for PC gaming. That has changed rather quickly. Hardware…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":74209,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"fifu_image_url":"","fifu_image_alt":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[32],"tags":[10534,27682,2771,1052,28],"class_list":["post-74208","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-tech-gadgets-reviews","tag-gigabyte","tag-mo32u24","tag-monitor","tag-oled","tag-review","wpcat-32-id"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/sgbuzz.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/74208","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/sgbuzz.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/sgbuzz.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sgbuzz.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sgbuzz.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=74208"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/sgbuzz.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/74208\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sgbuzz.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/74209"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/sgbuzz.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=74208"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sgbuzz.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=74208"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sgbuzz.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=74208"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}Performance impressions<\/h2>\n
Final thoughts<\/h2>\n
\n
\n
Read Full Article At Source <\/a>
\n