\n<\/p>\n
\u201cAs alleged, the bridge was struck and collapsed because those who were responsible for the ship\u2019s operation deliberately cut corners at the expense of safety,\u201d said Jimmy Paul, head of the FBI\u2019s Baltimore office.<\/p>\n
The companies and Nair are charged with conspiracy, wilfully failing to immediately inform the US Coast Guard of a known hazardous condition, obstructing an investigation by the National Transportation Safety Board and making false statements.<\/p>\n
The Synergy companies are also charged with misdemeanours for the release of pollutants into the Patapsco River, including shipping containers and their contents.<\/p>\n
The FBI’s investigation focused on the vessel\u2019s operations and whether the crew knew of critical systems issues before leaving port. The NTSB found that the two electrical blackouts disabled the controls of the huge cargo ship before it crashed into the bridge.<\/p>\n
The ship had experienced two blackouts in port a day earlier, but Synergy didn\u2019t investigate or report those as required and provided false information to the NTSB, the government alleges.<\/p>\n
Maryland officials estimate it could cost between US$4.3 billion and US$5.2 billion to replace the bridge, which is expected to be open to traffic in late 2030.<\/p>\n
\u201cThe altered skyline is a constant reminder of this tragedy,\u201d Paul said.<\/p>\n
But the true cost of the collapse was far greater, according to the Maryland Attorney General\u2019s Office. It halted shipping at the Port of Baltimore, disrupted the livelihoods of thousands, rerouted road traffic through communities already bearing disproportionate burdens and triggered economic problems statewide.<\/p>\n
The indictment comes on the heels of a settlement in principle between the State of Maryland, Synergy Marine and Grace Ocean Private Limited, the Singapore-based ship owner, Attorney General Anthony Brown announced in April.<\/p>\n
That lawsuit alleged the crash was the result of negligence, mismanagement and the reckless operation of a vessel that was not seaworthy and should never have left port. Plaintiffs include the families of the six construction workers who died, owners of cargo that was on the ship and local governments seeking damages for economic losses. The details of the settlement haven\u2019t been disclosed and some portions of the lawsuit remain unresolved.<\/p>\n
The state sought damages on behalf of its agencies for the destruction of the bridge, harm to the Patapsco River and surrounding environment, lost revenues and economic losses to Maryland and its residents.<\/p>\n
The settlement does not resolve any claims the state has against the shipbuilder, Hyundai, the attorney general\u2019s office said in April.<\/p>\n
The bridge, a longstanding Baltimore landmark, was a vital piece of transportation infrastructure that allowed drivers to easily bypass downtown. The original 2.6km steel span took five years to build and opened to traffic in 1977.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n