{"id":51840,"date":"2026-05-12T21:26:37","date_gmt":"2026-05-12T13:26:37","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/sgbuzz.com\/?p=51840"},"modified":"2026-05-12T21:26:37","modified_gmt":"2026-05-12T13:26:37","slug":"terry-xu-ordered-to-pay-over-154k-in-legal-costs","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/sgbuzz.com\/?p=51840","title":{"rendered":"Terry Xu ordered to pay over $154k in legal costs"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><br \/>\n<\/p>\n<div>\n<p class=\"font-body-baseline-regular text-primary\" data-testid=\"article-paragraph-annotation-test-id\">SINGAPORE &#8211;<!-- --> The High Court on May 11 ordered The Online Citizen (TOC) chief editor Terry Xu to pay more than $154,000 in legal costs to Cabinet ministers K. Shanmugam and Tan See Leng over the defamation suit they had brought against him.<\/p>\n<p class=\"font-body-baseline-regular text-primary\" data-testid=\"article-paragraph-annotation-test-id\">The sum comprises $78,000 in lawyers\u2019 fees \u2013 $39,000 for each minister \u2013 and more than $76,000 in disbursements, which are out-of-pocket expenses.<\/p>\n<p class=\"font-body-baseline-regular text-primary\" data-testid=\"article-paragraph-annotation-test-id\">Mr Shanmugam, the Coordinating Minister for National Security, was awarded $44,398.25 in disbursements, while Dr Tan, the Manpower Minister,\u00a0was awarded $32,064.25.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p class=\"font-body-baseline-regular text-primary\" data-testid=\"article-paragraph-annotation-test-id\">Mr Xu was not present or represented by a lawyer at the hearing to determine legal costs.<\/p>\n<p class=\"font-body-baseline-regular text-primary\" data-testid=\"article-paragraph-annotation-test-id\">In March, Mr Shanmugam, who is also Home Affairs Minister, and Dr Tan were <a href=\"https:\/\/www.straitstimes.com\/singapore\/shanmugam-tan-see-leng-each-awarded-210000-in-defamation-suit-against-tocs-terry-xu?ref=inline-article\" rel=\"noopener\" class=\"gap-x-04 items-center inline text-primary-60 select-auto\" aria-label=\"link\" target=\"_blank\" data-testid=\"custom-link\"><span class=\"font-body-baseline-regular inline\" data-testid=\"paragraph-test-id\">each awarded $210,000 in damages<\/span><\/a> over an article that TOC had published in December 2024, titled \u201cBloomberg: Nearly half of 2024 GCB transactions lack public record, raising transparency concerns\u201d.<\/p>\n<p class=\"font-body-baseline-regular text-primary\" data-testid=\"article-paragraph-annotation-test-id\">The TOC article <a href=\"https:\/\/www.straitstimes.com\/singapore\/courts-crime\/ministers-shanmugam-tan-see-leng-say-parts-of-bloomberg-article-calculated-to-disparage-them?ref=inline-article\" rel=\"noopener\" class=\"gap-x-04 items-center inline text-primary-60 select-auto\" aria-label=\"link\" target=\"_blank\" data-testid=\"custom-link\"><span class=\"font-body-baseline-regular inline\" data-testid=\"paragraph-test-id\">referred to a Dec 12, 2024, Bloomberg article<\/span><\/a>\u00a0on good class bungalow (GCB) transactions which mentioned the property deals made by the two ministers in 2023.<\/p>\n<p class=\"font-body-baseline-regular text-primary\" data-testid=\"article-paragraph-annotation-test-id\">The Bloomberg article, headlined \u201cSingapore mansion deals are increasingly shrouded in secrecy\u201d, is the subject of a separate defamation suit Mr Shanmugam and Dr Tan brought against the financial news provider and its journalist Low De Wei.<\/p>\n<p class=\"font-body-baseline-regular text-primary\" data-testid=\"article-paragraph-annotation-test-id\">These lawsuits were filed on Jan 6, 2025.<\/p>\n<p class=\"font-body-baseline-regular text-primary\" data-testid=\"article-paragraph-annotation-test-id\">The ministers were granted permission by the court on Jan 28 that year to serve the legal papers on Mr Xu in Taiwan.<\/p>\n<p class=\"font-body-baseline-regular text-primary\" data-testid=\"article-paragraph-annotation-test-id\">He did not file a response in his defence.<\/p>\n<p class=\"font-body-baseline-regular text-primary\" data-testid=\"article-paragraph-annotation-test-id\">On Aug 26, 2025, Justice Audrey Lim\u00a0granted default judgment in favour of Mr Shanmugam and Dr Tan.<\/p>\n<p class=\"font-body-baseline-regular text-primary\" data-testid=\"article-paragraph-annotation-test-id\">Mr Xu was also absent from the subsequent <a href=\"https:\/\/www.straitstimes.com\/singapore\/courts-crime\/shanmugam-and-tan-see-leng-in-high-court-hearing-over-defamation-suit-against-tocs-terry-xu?ref=inline-article\" rel=\"noopener\" class=\"gap-x-04 items-center inline text-primary-60 select-auto\" aria-label=\"link\" target=\"_blank\" data-testid=\"custom-link\"><span class=\"font-body-baseline-regular inline\" data-testid=\"paragraph-test-id\">hearing to assess the quantum of damages<\/span><\/a>, held on Feb 26.<\/p>\n<p class=\"font-body-baseline-regular text-primary\" data-testid=\"article-paragraph-annotation-test-id\">In a letter sent to the court that day, he stated categorically that he was not submitting to the jurisdiction of the Singapore courts for the assessment of damages or any other substantive stage of the proceedings.<\/p>\n<p class=\"font-body-baseline-regular text-primary\" data-testid=\"article-paragraph-annotation-test-id\">In her written judgment issued on March 31, <!-- -->Justice Lim<!-- --> said Mr Xu\u2019s failure to file a defence meant that the facts in the ministers\u2019 statements of claim are taken to be admitted by him.<\/p>\n<p class=\"font-body-baseline-regular text-primary\" data-testid=\"article-paragraph-annotation-test-id\">She set out the factors that pointed towards the award of higher damages.<\/p>\n<p class=\"font-body-baseline-regular text-primary\" data-testid=\"article-paragraph-annotation-test-id\">Justice Lim said the TOC article\u2019s allegations attacked the ministers\u2019 character by portraying them as individuals who are part of an opaque system and who circumvented transparency requirements to avoid scrutiny of their conduct, and therefore suggesting that they had done something improper.<\/p>\n<p class=\"font-body-baseline-regular text-primary\" data-testid=\"article-paragraph-annotation-test-id\">\u201cAs Cabinet ministers, these allegations disparage not only the claimants\u2019 personal (reputation) but professional reputation as well,\u201d she added.<\/p>\n<p class=\"font-body-baseline-regular text-primary\" data-testid=\"article-paragraph-annotation-test-id\">Justice Lim said Mr Xu\u2019s defamatory allegations were very grave as they directly impugned the claimants\u2019 personal integrity, character and professional reputation.<\/p>\n<p class=\"font-body-baseline-regular text-primary\" data-testid=\"article-paragraph-annotation-test-id\">The extent of publication and republication of the article was substantial, she noted. Besides being accessible on TOC\u2019s website, the article was also published on TOC\u2019s social media platforms.<\/p>\n<p class=\"font-body-baseline-regular text-primary\" data-testid=\"article-paragraph-annotation-test-id\">Mr Xu also amplified the defamatory content by publishing four additional articles between Dec 23, 2024, and Jan 3, 2025, that referred to or contained links to the original article. Each of these subsequent articles was also promoted on TOC\u2019s social media accounts.<\/p>\n<p class=\"font-body-baseline-regular text-primary\" data-testid=\"article-paragraph-annotation-test-id\">The judge also found that Mr Xu had acted in malice. Mr Xu was put on notice to the falsehoods in the article by Dr Tan and Mr Shanmugam\u2019s lawyers on Dec 19, 2024, and in an article on the Government\u2019s fact-checking website Factually on Dec 23, 2024.<\/p>\n<p class=\"font-body-baseline-regular text-primary\" data-testid=\"article-paragraph-annotation-test-id\">He responded by saying that the article was \u201cbased on factual and verifiable public records\u201d, and maintained that its contents were true and entirely justified, the judge noted.<\/p>\n<p class=\"font-body-baseline-regular text-primary\" data-testid=\"article-paragraph-annotation-test-id\">Mr Xu also breached an Aug 26, 2025, injunction order that restrained him from disseminating the defamatory allegations.<\/p>\n<p class=\"font-body-baseline-regular text-primary\" data-testid=\"article-paragraph-annotation-test-id\">In their lawsuits, Mr Shanmugam and Dr Tan had each sought damages in excess of the awards made in two other defamation cases.<\/p>\n<p class=\"font-body-baseline-regular text-primary\" data-testid=\"article-paragraph-annotation-test-id\">These are a 2021 case where then Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong \u2013 who is now Senior Minister \u2013 was awarded $210,000 against Mr Xu for a TOC article on 38 Oxley Road; and a 2024 case where Mr Shanmugam was awarded $200,000 against Mr\u00a0Lee Hsien Yang for defaming him over his rental of a state property in Ridout Road.<\/p>\n<p class=\"font-body-baseline-regular text-primary\" data-testid=\"article-paragraph-annotation-test-id\">Justice Lim said the nature of the defamation in the present case was, in her view, graver than in the case involving Senior Minister Lee.<\/p>\n<p class=\"font-body-baseline-regular text-primary\" data-testid=\"article-paragraph-annotation-test-id\">In that case, Mr Xu\u2019s allegations impugned SM Lee\u2019s reputation and character by alleging that he was dishonest, but the allegations related primarily to a family feud and not, say, to misconduct in his capacity as a public officer pertaining to public funds or to serious criminal conduct, she added.<\/p>\n<p class=\"font-body-baseline-regular text-primary\" data-testid=\"article-paragraph-annotation-test-id\">The extent of publication and republication in the present case was highly substantial, said the judge \u2013 much larger than the case involving Mr Shanmugam and Mr Lee Hsien Yang, and comparable to the case involving SM Lee.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p><br \/>\n<br \/><a href=\"https:\/\/www.straitstimes.com\/singapore\/courts-crime\/tocs-terry-xu-ordered-to-pay-more-than-154000-in-costs-to-shanmugam-tan-see-leng\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Read Full Article At Source <\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>SINGAPORE &#8211; The High Court on May 11 ordered The Online Citizen (TOC) chief editor Terry Xu to pay more than $154,000 in legal costs&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":51841,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"fifu_image_url":"","fifu_image_alt":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[2611],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-51840","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-buzz-headlines","wpcat-2611-id"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/sgbuzz.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/51840","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/sgbuzz.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/sgbuzz.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sgbuzz.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sgbuzz.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=51840"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/sgbuzz.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/51840\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sgbuzz.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/51841"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/sgbuzz.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=51840"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sgbuzz.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=51840"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sgbuzz.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=51840"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}