\n<\/p>\n
SMU assistant law professor Benjamin Ong noted that the WP signalled through its statement that Mr Singh’s conduct had repercussions not just for him but for the party as well.<\/p>\n
Even so, he added that the party should provide more details about what went into the final decision.<\/p>\n
The disciplinary panel had identified two specific breaches of the constitution by Mr Singh \u2013 acting \u201ccontrary to the principles or aims or objects of the party or prejudicial to the welfare of the party\u201d and failing to \u201csupport the three-fold principle of the party, and to comply with party discipline in major decisions of policy, and to be honest and frank in all his dealings with the party and the people of Singapore\u201d.<\/p>\n
\u201cI wish there had been more detail on precisely which of the WP\u2019s principles had been engaged here, and precisely which instances of conduct had been considered unacceptable,\u201d said Asst Prof Ong.<\/p>\n
\u201cOf course, no political party has a legal obligation to make public the details of such matters, but such details could well make a difference to voters\u2019 decisions.\u201d<\/p>\n
He also called for greater transparency over how the CEC weighed possible sanctions before deciding on a reprimand.<\/p>\n
National University of Singapore assistant professor of political science Elvin Ong said the WP had pointed to mitigating factors in its statement, including that Mr Singh did not intend to do anything “prejudicial to the welfare of the party”.<\/p>\n
The outcome of the disciplinary inquiry makes clear that the party stands firmly behind its secretary-general, despite his actions and the court\u2019s ruling, said observers.<\/p>\n
\u201cIt’s telling the people that they do recognise that Pritam did such a thing and (that they) are not contravening the court’s decision at all, but also finding a balanced outcome,\u201d said Dr Felix Tan.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhether anyone thinks it is a good or bad outcome, the finding itself shows that the party does not feel that Pritam should be gotten rid of or kicked out of the party.\u201d<\/p>\n
The party is set to issue a notice for a special cadre members’ conference within the next two weeks.<\/p>\n
The investigating team will need to explain to the party’s cadre ranks how it reached its conclusion, Dr Tan added.<\/p>\n
\u201cThey will find a middle ground and compromise between all camps in the party. After all, is there anyone else who has the influence that Pritam has within the party now?\u201d he said.<\/p>\n
However, SMU\u2019s Assoc Prof Tan noted that while party supporters have largely closed ranks, Mr Singh\u2019s \u201ccredibility and integrity have been undermined within and outside the party\u201d throughout the saga.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n