\n<\/p>\n
A netizen recently kicked off a heated Reddit debate after pointing out a small but sore point about dining in Singapore.<\/p>\n
In a post titled \u201cWhy Singapore eateries do not give tissue and water for free\u201d, the OP vented after returning from a holiday in Japan.<\/p>\n
\u201cIt’s standard issue no matter where I went, there is tissue and water served, no questions asked. Service charge was non-existent even in a restaurant. If there was any appetiser, it would be explained on the menu that there is a fee,\u201d they wrote.<\/p>\n
They then contrasted that experience with dining in Singapore: \u201cWater is charged minimally at 50 cents and wet tissue also charged. Service charge is almost everywhere. Appetiser is sneaked in and charged at the bill, Chinese restaurants i’m looking at you. Is Singapore really a money grab due to the REITs? Or is there a cultural difference?\u201d<\/p>\n
Unsurprisingly, netizens had a lot<\/em> to say.<\/p>\n Many agreed that in Singapore, \u201cprofit comes before customer service,\u201d with some recalling a time when free water was the norm.<\/p>\n Others blamed rising costs. With rentals skyrocketing \u2014 especially in prime locations \u2014 eateries are \u201cforced to charge for everything.\u201d<\/p>\n One commenter summed it up neatly: \u201cIt\u2019s a mix of culture and business model. Japan treats water and tissue as basic hospitality, while Singapore eateries rely more on add-on charges to survive high rents.\u201d<\/p>\n Another was far less diplomatic: \u201cIt’s because of greedy landlords.\u201d<\/p>\n \u201cThere is an obsession with cost cutting and profit maximising in Singapore. Owners want to maximise profits so that they can afford their cars and condo mortgages. They will continue to do so if the consumers are okay with it,\u201d another wrote.<\/p>\n Some argued that charging for water and tissues is simply the reality of running an F&B business here. While overseas eateries may operate at lower costs, family-owned restaurants in Singapore are often priced out \u2014 leaving only hawker stalls, while larger chains dominate the scene.<\/p>\n One netizen urged diners to push back: \u201cStop going to restaurants that has service charge but do not even give you tap water.\u201d<\/p>\n They argued that proper service \u2014 greeting guests, offering water, checking on condiments \u2014 should be the bare minimum, and that diners shouldn\u2019t accept service charges when these basics aren\u2019t met.<\/p>\n Others suggested alternatives, pointing to Japan-owned chain Saizeriya, where water and tissues are still free.<\/p>\n That said, not everyone sided with the OP.<\/p>\n One commenter offered a counterpoint: In the end, the debate highlights the tug-of-war between rising business costs, customer expectations, and cultural norms in Singapore\u2019s F&B scene \u2014 with no clear winner in sight.<\/p>\n Balancing fair service with business survival? Clearly, it\u2019s not as simple as offering a free cup of water.<\/p>\n Photos:\u00a0Khoi Pham<\/a>\/ Pexels, Reddit\/\u00a0r\/SingaporeRaw<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n
\u201cOn the flip side, Singaporean customers are likely to abuse the system whenever there are free things. I see people taking serviettes at Starbucks and drinking free water without ordering anything.\u201d<\/p>\n