{"id":19318,"date":"2025-12-13T11:17:42","date_gmt":"2025-12-13T03:17:42","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/sgbuzz.com\/?p=19318"},"modified":"2025-12-13T11:17:42","modified_gmt":"2025-12-13T03:17:42","slug":"mediacorp-apologises-takes-down-pritam-singh-interview-that-agc-said-was-in-contempt-of-court","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/sgbuzz.com\/?p=19318","title":{"rendered":"Mediacorp apologises, takes down Pritam Singh interview that AGC said was in contempt of court"},"content":{"rendered":"


\n<\/p>\n

\n

SINGAPORE \u2013 Mediacorp has apologised for and taken down an interview with Leader of the Opposition Pritam Singh after being told by the Attorney-General\u2019s Chambers (AGC) that it was in contempt of court.<\/p>\n

The broadcaster said in a Dec 13 statement that in an interview for CNA\u2019s The Assembly programme, Mr Singh made comments regarding the court case related to former Workers\u2019 Party (WP) MP Raeesah Khan, <\/p>\n

where he had been found guilty by the Magistrate\u2019s Court in February 2025<\/p>\n

<\/a> of lying on oath to the Committee of Privileges.<\/p>\n

The episode aired on Nov 5, a day after Mr Singh\u2019s appeal against his conviction was heard, with the court reserving its judgment. <\/p>\n

Mediacorp, which is CNA\u2019s parent company, said it accepts that the publication of the interview, which contained the statements by Mr Singh regarding the case relating to Ms Khan, is in contempt of court. <\/p>\n

\u201cWe wholly and unreservedly apologise to the court. We have taken down the interview from our platforms and channels and will avoid publishing matters that are in contempt of court in future.\u201d<\/p>\n

CNA, in a report on Dec 13, said Mediacorp had been notified by the AGC that the interview was in contempt of court.<\/p>\n

The interview was recorded in July 2025. <\/p>\n

The Straits Times has contacted AGC and WP for comment.<\/p>\n

On the programme, Mr Singh, who is WP chief, had said to neurodivergent interviewers that he believes the court of public opinion can be bigger than any court in the world, when asked about his February conviction for lying under oath to a parliamentary committee.<\/p>\n

Mr Singh also said his party\u2019s respectable performance at the May general election showed what the public thought of his role in the saga resulting in Ms Khan\u2019s resignation from Parliament. <\/p>\n

Ms Khan had resigned in 2021 after admitting to giving a false anecdote in the House. <\/p>\n

His comments drew criticism from Minister for Law Edwin Tong, who said on Nov 8 that Mr Singh\u2019s statement on the court of public opinion was outrageous, plainly wrong and completely unacceptable.<\/p>\n

Mr Tong said then: \u201cMr Singh was investigated, and then he was charged. He went through a full and open trial and was convicted by the court for lying to a parliamentary select committee.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe judge gave detailed grounds setting out the basis for the conviction. I think it ran into almost 150 pages. This judgment is, today, valid and binding.\u201d<\/p>\n

Mr Tong added: \u201cNo one should dismiss or denigrate the court\u2019s judgment or suggest that public opinion can somehow trump a court\u2019s decision.\u201d<\/p>\n

On Dec 4, speaking to reporters after <\/p>\n

his appeal was dismissed,<\/p>\n

<\/a> Mr Singh was asked how he thought he would fare in the court of public opinion.<\/p>\n

\n
\"\"<\/picture><\/div>
\n

In an interview for CNA\u2019s The Assembly programme, Mr Pritam Singh made comments regarding the court case related to former WP MP Raeesah Khan, where he had been found guilty by the Magistrate\u2019s Court in February 2025 of lying on oath to the Committee of Privileges.<\/p>\n

ST PHOTO: KUA CHEE SIONG<\/p>\n<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

Mr Singh said: \u201cI want to be careful with that. The court, in the matter of my magistrate\u2019s appeal, has delivered its verdict and I think we should respect it.\u201d<\/p>\n

He also said that he respected and accepted the judgment \u201cfully and without reservation\u201d.<\/p>\n

He told the media: \u201cFirst and foremost, the Supreme Court is a vital pillar of our constitutional framework.<\/p>\n

\u201cI have always had deep respect for the independence, rigour and professionalism of the courts.\u201d<\/p>\n

He was also asked about other comments he made on The Assembly about how his political opponents would \u201cdo whatever it takes\u201d to lower his and his party\u2019s esteem.<\/p>\n

He said that as an opposition MP, he will have political differences with his opponents.<\/p>\n

\u201cBut those differences do not extend to tearing the system down, and questioning or impugning the integrity of the courts or even civil servants, for example. That cannot be how we conduct opposition politics in Singapore.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n