\n<\/p>\n
Asked what questions Singapore should consider in weighing the viability of nuclear energy, Prof Williams said the discussion must factor in climate change, energy security and public trust.<\/p>\n
Most of Singapore\u2019s electricity comes from natural gas, which will not last forever, he noted.<\/p>\n
\u201cWe know there’s an impact of hydrocarbons on climate change. As the gas runs out, the price will go up, so in terms of energy security, you have to look at what the alternatives are \u2013 nuclear, solar, wind.\u201d<\/p>\n
Given Singapore\u2019s geography, nuclear power has a few advantages over the other two options, which require space to set up wind turbines or solar panels, said Prof Williams.<\/p>\n
While acknowledging that public confidence in nuclear safety remains a challenge, Prof Williams pointed out that there are about 450 reactors operating worldwide, with over 20,000 reactor years of safe operation.<\/p>\n
\u201cThe technology is very mature. And if these reactors are designed properly, built properly and operated properly, and they have a strong regulator, we should be all right.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/div>\n